Monday, December 30, 2019

Goods And Services Tax On E-Commerce


Goods And Services Tax On E-Commerce 


Goods and Services Tax (GST) is an indirect tax (or consumption tax) on the supply of goods and services. It is a comprehensive, multistage, destination-based tax: comprehensive because it has subsumed almost all the indirect taxes except a few state taxes. This article is about the few provisions of GST on E-Commerce. There are a few distinctly specific provisions applicable to e-commerce operators and suppliers of goods or services supplying through e-commerce portals. 


Mainly there are two modes of operation in e-commerce. 
1)    The supplier himself supplying goods or services through an e-commerce portal. GST laws remain the same for the said supplier. 

2)    The marketplace of e-commerce is popularized by Amazon, Zomato, etc. Here the e-commerce operator merely provides a platform to various suppliers. Two transactions are happening in this model- (i) supplier supplying goods or services to the consumers and (ii) the e-commerce operator supplying services to the supplier using its platform. These are distinct transactions, and attract GST on their own.

Liability to pay GST:
In general, liability to pay GST is on the supplier of goods and services. Even in e-commerce transactions, the persons supplying goods or services through the platform are the suppliers. Thus, a person selling the goods on Amazon or Zomato is a supplier of goods and services and he is required to follow GST provisions. 

Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) is a tax levied on Intra State supplies of both goods and services by the Central Government and will be governed by the CGST Act.

SGST will also be levied on the same Intra State supply but will be governed by the State Government

However, Section 9(5) of the CGST Act provides that the tax on intra-State supplies of which shall be paid by the electronic commerce operator if such services are supplied through it. Three services, namely (i) Motor Cab (ii) Hotels and accommodation and (iii) Housekeeping services has been notified under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act.

In Re: Opta Cabs Pvt. Ltd. [2019 (20) GSTL 161], Appellate authority of Advance Ruling held that when transportation of passenger service is provided by the taxi drivers by using a software application, the e-commerce operator is liable to pay GST even if payment is not directly received by the e-commerce operator. Thus e-commerce operators, engaged in providing services notified under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act are required to develop their software application model in such a way that they can discharge the GST liability.

In case of the supply of goods, the liability to pay GST always remains on the supplier of goods. Thus, any person supplying goods through Amazon is responsible for discharging its own GST liability. 

In case of the supply of services, all suppliers of services are required to discharge its own GST liability, except the services notified under Section 9(5) of the CGST Act.

GST Registration Threshold Limits
Under Section 24 (ix) of the CGST Act, every person supplying goods or services through electronic commerce operators are required to be compulsorily registered, without any threshold exemption limit. 

However, the Government has the power to exempt specified supplier from registration. Vide Notification No. 65/2017-C.T., dated 15-11-2017; the Central Government, exempted persons making supplies of services, other than supplies specified under sub-section (5) of section 9 of the said Act through an electronic commerce operator and having an aggregate turnover, to be computed on all India basis, not exceeding an amount of twenty lakh rupees in a financial year.

Thus, persons supplying services other than those mentioned in Section 9(5) of the CGST Act are required to register and collect GST only if their turnover is more than the threshold limit. Persons supplying services mentioned in Section 9(5) are not liable to be registered under GST even if their turnover is more than the threshold limit, as a liability to pay GST is on the e-commerce operator.

It is noted that the exemption has been provided from registration itself, and registration provisions are squarely applicable also to IGST/SGST Act, and hence even inter-state supplies are exempt from payment of GST on such supply of service up to threshold limit of exemption.

Thus, persons supplying services through e-commerce operators enjoy the threshold exemption limit. However, such benefit is not available to persons supplying goods through e-commerce operators. Such suppliers of goods are required to get compulsorily registered under GST even if their turnover is less than the threshold limit. It means they are required to register before selling through the e-commerce platform. All platforms like Amazon, Flipkart, etc. require GSTIN at the time of registration as a seller on their platform.

Commission Charged from Suppliers:
E-commerce portals are charging a commission from various suppliers. E-commerce portals are required to be compulsorily registered under Section 24(ix) of the CGST Act and shall be paying GST on commission amount received, without availing any exemption threshold limit. The tax shall be charged in the invoices raised against the supplier of goods or services, and such suppliers can avail Input Tax Credit (ITC) (ITC is the tax that a business pays on a purchase and that it can use to reduce its tax liability when it makes a sale. In other words, businesses can reduce their tax liability by claiming credit to the extent of GST paid on purchases) on such GST charged, if otherwise eligible.

Tax Collection at Source (TCS):
An electronic commerce operator is also required to collect tax under Section 52 of the CGST Act, called TCS. The provision essentially imposes a duty on e-commerce operators to collect tax, from the amount payable to the supplier. Such TCS deducted is reflected in the electronic cash ledger of the supplier. However, the Government has clarified that TCS shall be deducted only when the supplier is liable to pay GST. 

TCS is not required to be collected on exempt supplies [FAQ on TCS issued by CBIC]. 

For the purposes of TCS, an e-commerce operator has to obtain separate registration for TCS, irrespective of the fact that it is already registered under GST as a supplier or otherwise and has GSTIN. The section imposes a duty on electronic commerce operators to collect a tax, from the consideration required to be paid to the persons making supplies of goods or services or both through its platform. The deduction shall be done on a monthly basis on the net value of taxable supplies.

E-commerce portal from outside India:
As a matter of general rule, liability to pay tax is fastened only on the persons supplying goods or services, through an establishment located in India. If such supplies are made from a location outside India, the supplier cannot be fastened with a GST payment liability. The supply of goods is a simple example. Say, a foreign manufacturer supplying goods to an importer in India. Though that foreign manufacturer is a supplier of goods, liability to pay GST is not on that foreign manufacturer. GST is paid by the importer located in India at the time of import. 

Similarly, when the supplier of services supplies certain services to an Indian resident, liability to pay GST on such supply is on the person receiving the services under the reverse charge method. Thus, when an e-commerce operator is located outside India, in general, there is no GST liability on that operator. Goods supplied through such a foreign located e-commerce portal shall attract IGST at the time of import, and services supplied through such an e-commerce portal shall attract GST on the reverse charge method.

Online Information and Database Access and Retrieval Service is an exception to the above-said provision. In the case of OIDAR service, the liability to pay tax is there even on the non-resident suppliers of services. The Integrated Goods and Service Tax Act defines OIDAR to mean services whose delivery is mediated by information technology over the internet or an electronic network and the nature of which renders their supply essentially automated and involving minimal human intervention and impossible to ensure in the absence of information technology and includes electronic services such as, – (i) advertising on the internet; (ii) providing cloud services; (iii) provision of e-books, movie, music, software and other intangibles through telecommunication networks or internet; (iv) providing data or information, retrievable or otherwise, to any person in electronic form through a computer network; (v) online supplies of digital content (movies, television shows, music and the like); (vi) digital data storage; and (vii) online gaming. The definition is inclusive and also includes similar services apart from what is enumerated in the definition clause. We can see from the definition itself that that tax has been imposed essentially automated digital services requiring minimal human intervention. A simple procedure has been devised for non-resident suppliers of OIDAR services to pay GST.

Conclusion:
E-commerce involves in many transactions when a person is buying goods in the e-commerce platform. Two transactions are happening simultaneously. The supplier is supplying goods through an e-commerce portal and the e-commerce portal is supplying services to the supplier. Both the transactions are different transactions and subject to GST in its own nature. TCS provisions come into operations at the end of the month when the e-commerce operator is transferring considerations received to the supplier of goods or services.


Online Information Database Access and Retrival - OIDAR

Online Information Database Access and Retrieval (OIDAR)   is a category of services provided through the medium of internet and received by the recipient online without having any physical interface with the supplier of such services. Example - downloading an e-book online for payment would amount to a receipt of OIDAR services by the consumer downloading the e-book and making payment. 

The Integrated Goods and Services Act defines OIDAR to mean services whose delivery is mediated by information technology over the internet or an electronic network and the nature of which renders their supply essentially automated and involving minimal human intervention and impossible to ensure in the absence of information technology and included electronic services such as, 

a)    Advertisement on the internet. 
b)    Providing Cloud Services.
c)    Providing e-books, movies, music, software and other intangibles through telecommunication             networks or the internet.
d)    Providing data or information, retrievable or otherwise to any person in electronic form through          a computer network.
e)    Digital Data Storage.
f)    Online Gaming.



Saturday, December 28, 2019

Tamil Nadu Real Estate Regulatory Authority (TNRERA) - Builders cannot change terms and condition of agreement unilaterally.

The adjudicating officer of TNRERA states that building developers cannot unilaterally alter the undertaking given to the buyer.

Download Judgment 

Delhi High Court - Directs In-laws who wants to evict the woman (daughter-in-law) - provide her alternate accommodation.

A woman filed a case under the Domestic Violence Act against her husband and her in-laws. Even if her husband and her in-laws own the property, she cannot be evicted from a shared house by them till they provide alternative accommodation for her, the Delhi High Court has said in a significant ruling.

Further, the Delhi High Court stated that a civil court cannot render a woman roofless as long as she continues to be in a matrimonial relationship.


The Senior Citizen Act states that law was enacted to ensure that parents and senior citizens are not made to suffer by their children or forced to reside with estranged daughter-in-law in a property that exclusively stands in their names. However, the right of residence under the Domestic Violence Act is a special step towards ensuring that a helpless wife and her children are not abandoned without any shelter and by categorically protecting their right to reside in the shared household, irrespective of whether the aggrieved wife or her spouse bears any title or interest in the said household.
   

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Difference between a gift and a bribe given to a government officer

GIFT
A gift is something of value given without the expectation of return. Further, a gift is freely given with no strings attached. On some festival occasions gifts are exchanged ie there is an informal reciprocal agreement between the parties. Gifts are usually given with the motive of appreciation, fondness or love.

BRIBE
A bribe is the same thing given in the hope to influence or benefit something from a authority. A bribe is given with a string attached to dishonestly persuade someone to act in one's favour by a gift of anything such as cash or product. Moreover they are given as a reward for compliance by the Government Authority.

Most of us know about bribery, which amounts to corruption.. So let me give details of provisions made under the CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES (CONDUCT) RULES, 1964 as regards Gifts. Under Rule 13 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964.  
No Government servant shall accept, or permit any member of his family or any other person acting on his behalf to accept, any gift.
EXPLANATION.- The expression "gift" shall include free transport, boarding, lodging or other service or any other pecuniary advantage when provided by any person other than a near relative or personal friend having no official dealings with the Government servant.
Government servant may accept gifts from his near relatives or from his personal friends having no official dealings with him, but he shall make a report to the Government if the value of such gift exceeds limit prescribed by the Government.

Saturday, August 17, 2019

Appearance in Court of Party in-person - Procedure

According to the PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE of SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

Appearance in Court of Party in-person

Any person not represented by an advocate on-record, subject to the provisions of Order IV Rule 1(c) proviso of the Rules, can be permitted by the Court to appear and argue his case in-person. He can remain present in Court at the time of hearing of his case and be escorted by a police personnel. A party in-person shall maintain decorum and dignity of the Court during the hearing of his case.

Order IV Rule 1(c) of Supreme Court Rules, 2013 - In petitions/appeals received from jail or a mailer filed by a party-in- person or \lhere a party-inperson as respondent is not represented by an Advocate-on-Record. the Secretary General/Registrar may require the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee to assign an Advocate. who may assist the Court on behalf of such person.

Thursday, August 15, 2019

What is claim recovery

Claim recovery is called “subrogation”,  the substitution of one person or group by another in respect of a debt or insurance claim, accompanied by the transfer of any associated rights and duties. Which is a legal term meaning that the insurance company assumes the right of its insured to pursue a claim against a wrongdoer.
If your insurance company pays for damage to your car under the collision coverage, it will pursue its payment (and your deductible amount) from the party who was at fault for the accident. It will make a subrogation claim against that person’s insurance company. If it recovers all or part of the loss, you will get a pro rata share of your deductible back again.
Claim recovery also includes “salvage”. If your wrecked car was deemed to be a total loss (which means merely that it is financially impractical to repair it—not that it cannot be repaired), the wreck has value. It will be sold at an auto salvage auction to a salvage buyer. The money recovered goes to the insurance company that paid the claim. The salvage buyer will in turn sell undamaged parts to shops that are repairing other vehicles.

Doctrine of Pay and Recover in Motor Vehicle Act - Accident Cases

In this recent case, Shamanna v. The Divisional Manager, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. 
Date of Judgment: August 08, 2018
In the present case, the driver of the offending vehicle had no valid driving licence, at the time of the accident. This was clear violation of the terms of the insurance policy. The Tribunal had directed the insurance company to pay the compensation to the claimants and granted liberty to the insurance company to recover the same from the owner of the offending vehicle as "Pay and Recover".
In this particular case, the court held that it is the duty or obligation of the insurance company to prove that the driver had no valid driving license and such things lead to the breach of terms and conditions of the policy “pay and recover”  which can be ordered in cases of third-party risks. 
The High Court in appeal however held that only the owner of the offending vehicle was liable to make the payment of the compensation amount and that the Tribunal had no power to order for “pay and recover”.
The Supreme Court however held that the High Court could not interfere with the Tribunal’s order and that there was nothing in law or precedents which mandated that the power to order for pay and recover could be made by the Supreme Court only under Article 142 of the Constitution of India. Other observations made by the Supreme Court in the case are as under:
That as per the decision in National Insurance Company Ltd. v. Swaran Singh and others, the insurer had to indemnify the compensation amount payable to the third party and the insurance company may recover the same from the insured.
In this particular case, the court held that it is the duty or obligation of the insurance company to prove that the driver had no valid driving license and such things lead to the breach of terms and conditions of the policy “pay and recover”  which can be ordered in cases of third-party risks. 
Holding on to the decision of Laxmi Narain Dhut, the apex court directed the insurance company to pay the amount of compensation to the claimant accordingly and also said, “So far as the recovery of the amount from the owner of the vehicle, the insurance company shall recover as held in the decision in Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. vs. Nanjappan and others (2004) 9 13 SCC 224 where this court was held. Also, said, "…that for the purpose of recovering the same from the insured, the insurer shall not be required to file a suit." It may initiate a proceeding before the concerned Executing Court as if the dispute between the insurer and the owner was the subject matter of determination before the Tribunal and the issue is decided against the owner and in favour of the insurer”. 
Doctrine of “pay and recover” implies the liability of the insurance company in cases of breach of policy condition due to disqualifications of the driver or invalid driving licence of the driver and in case of third party risks, the insurer has to indemnify the compensation amount to the third party and the insurance company may recover the same from the insured.

What is Indian Motor Vehicle Act?

The Indian Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 is an Act which regulates all aspects of road transport vehicles.

Further Motor Vehicle Act provides in detail the legislative provisions regarding licensing of drivers/conductors, registration of motor vehicles, control of motor vehicles through permits, special provisions relating to state transport undertakings, traffic regulation, insurance, liability, offences and penalties, etc. 

The Government of India made the Central Motor Vehicles Rules 1989 to exercise the legislative provisions of Motor Vehicle Act.

Saturday, November 17, 2018

The right property is no longer fundamental right

Right to propery is Dominium eminens.

Hugo Grotius Theory of Eminent Domain

Conflict between public interest and Private interest

Deprivation of property must take place for public interest or public purpose.

Law, which deprives right to property for private interest will be unlawful and undermines rule of law.

Acquisition of private property by State for public interest is enforcement of Right of "Eminent Domain"

Though right to property is no longer fundamental right, but Article - 300A of the Indian Constitution mandates that no person shall be deprive of his property save by authority of law.